Reduction and Net Zero Targets
>Note: intensity targets are not represented in the current version - see Methodology
Gross Absolute Emission Reductions
There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Net Absolute Emission Reductions
There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Net Zero Future Commitments
There is no net zero target recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Offsets
Last update for St. James's Place by zerotracker.net: May 15, 2023Planning to use external offset credits | Yes |
Separate targets for emission reductions and removals | No |
Conditions on use of offset credits |
|
Plans for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) | Not Specified |
Additional notes: Our apporoach to offsetting: As part of our approach, we offset carbon emissions that we can’t reduce through our current initiatives. However, purchasing carbon credits alone is not a long-term strategy for tackling climate change, and we continue to work hard to reduce emissions throughout our operations, supply chain, Partnership and investments. We work with a reputable carbon offsetting company, Coco+, to reduce the impact of carbon emissions produced by SJP, investing in projects that benefit both people and planet. This year we offset 8,000 tCO 2 e across a mix of geographic locations by funding projects which supported clean cooking, renewable energy and forest conservation. All offsetting projects are aligned with the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) and we chose projects that supported not only the main UN Sustainable Development Goals we align with, but as many of the 17 as possible through the projects available to us
Score Summary
Ref | Principle |
Score
(points) |
Max
(points) |
Delta
(points) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | At least 2 years of GHG emissions for scope 1 and 2 are publicly-available and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
2 | Scope 3 emissions are fully reported and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
3 | CDP score demonstrates the level of transparent disclosures | 6.0 | 10.0 | - |
Transparency | 6.0 | 30.0 | - | |
4 | Net Zero Commitments by 2050 include an intermediate target and cover all the emissions | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
5 | Net Zero targets demonstrate a high-level of emergency | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
6 | Emission reduction targets on a forward-looking basis are ambitious | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
7 | Targets are science-based as validated by SBTi | 2.5 | 10.0 | - |
Commitments | 2.5 | 40.0 | - | |
8 | Results re. operational emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
9 | Results re. value chain emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
10 | Implied Temperature Rating by MSCi | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
Results | 0.0 | 30.0 | - | |
Total | 8.5 | 100.0 | - |
Score Details
Criteria | Results | 2023 Score | 2022 Score | Vs. 2022 | 2021 Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria 1 : Transparency on operational emissions (Scope 1 + 2) | |||||
Are S1+S2 figures publicly-disclosed for the last reporting year and the preceding period? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Are S1+S2 figures verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0/ 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 2 : Transparency on value chain emissions (Scope 3) | |||||
Are the 15 categories fully or partly disclosed? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Are S3 figures fully or partly verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 3 : Quality and Frequency of reporting | |||||
What is the latest CDP score (no later than the preceding year)? | C | 6.0 / 10.0 | - | ||
How many interim reporting were provided between 2 reporting periods (GHG emissions only)? | |||||
Criteria 4 : Net Zero Commitments | |||||
Does the net 0 target include a statement of a generally-accepted net zero emission target by 2050? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | - | ||
Does the net zero target include an intermediate target by 2030? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | - | ||
Does the net zero target include all the emissions? | NC | 0.0 / 4.0 | - | ||
Criteria 5 : Target year for Net Zero Commitments | |||||
Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2+S3 combined? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 6 : Reduction objectives | |||||
What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2? | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | |||
What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2+3? |
No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 7 : Science-Based Targets | |||||
What type of science-based target (as validated by SBTi) did the company commit to? | Committed NA | 2.5 / 10.0 | - | ||
Criteria 8 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 | |||||
Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 9 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 - 3 | |||||
Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 10 : Implied Temperature Rise (ITR) | |||||
Is the company aligned with global climate targets? | ITR: None°C | 0.0 / 10.0 | - | ||
Total | 8.5 / 100.0 | - |
© Vincent Manier - September 2021 About us . Keep in touch . Blog